Friday, February 5, 2016

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Obama's Call For Gun Registration Sounds Familiar

Obama's call for gun registration sounds familiar

It was the first step in confiscation in Hitler's Germany
and it will be the first step in confiscation in AMERICA! 

Don't let it happen here.
Support the Second Amendment!
Protect the Amendment that protects ALL of the other Right's
Protect FREEDOM!



Comments are invited!
Send feedback to:  WatchDog

Thursday, December 24, 2015

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Linked: The Popularity Of Trump And The Massacre In San Bernadino

Since the first poll showing Donald Trump as the leader of the GOP candidates, the pundits and the journalists have been predicting his fall.   

When Trump spoke out against illegal immigrates they said his numbers would plummet.
 After all, the media keeps reporting that the vast majority of Americans support amnesty. If the media is correct, would not the voters be repulsed by Trumps rhetoric?
However, the point margin between Trump and the other candidates grew even wider.  Contrary to popular relief, the American people seemed to like what Trump had to say.

When Barack Obama announced his plan to import thousands of Syrian refugees, The Donald spoke against the stupidity of Obama’s plan to import thousands of Syrian refugees which are certain to have ISIS terrorists embed with them.  German Intelligence had recently reported that they have identified nearly 7900 ISIS terrorist that came with the Syrian refugees that they have absorbed to date.  Trump even went so far as to suggest that perhaps we should impose a moratorium on all Muslims, at least until we learn to weed out the terrorists among them.

Once Again, the pundits, journalists, including many Republicans predicted Trumps fall from grace.   And once again, the polls proved them to be wrong.

So you ask—How could these ‘experts’ all be so wrong?

That’s where the San Bernardino Massacre comes in.

 As soon as the police identified the two terrorists, several people stepped forward to say that they had observed questionable activity at the terrorist’s home.   When asked why they had not reported this activity—each said that they were afraid of being branded a profiler or a bigot.

Tens of millions of U.S. citizens are intimidated by the thought police to the point that they will not express their feelings on nearly anything. 

When you engage people in casual, unguarded conversation you discover that most people are very concerned about amnesty.  They are concerned about the dilution of their votes and the drain on resources like healthcare, Medicare, social security, and other programs.

Almost no one wants a ‘comprehensive’ amnesty plan.  They want the boarders sealed. They want the alien criminals deported.  They want sanctuary cities ended. After that, they want a multi-year process by which those who came here illegally may earn permanent residence status without the right to vote.

As a result of this intimidation, no one really knows what American’s want—but that is how the administration likes it.

They don’t want us discussing global warming, same sex marriage, illegal immigration, Islamic issues, or the war on terrorism.  They don’t want us discussing these issues because they know that they will lose every intellectual debate.

Comments are invited!
Send e-mails to:  WatchDog

Thursday, December 10, 2015

Suspension Of Entry Of Inadmissible Aliens


8 US. Code 1182 - Inadmissible aliens 

(f) Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.

It's the LAW!

But some how Donald Trump is said to be a fool, bigot, and/or racist because he proposes to use the law which was  written so that our President can fulfill his duty to safe-guard the American people.

Perhaps, the real fools are those who put political correctness and their fear of criticism ahead of the nations security.


Comments are invited!
Send email to: WatchDog

Friday, November 27, 2015

Climate Plan An Exercise In Futility

Reprinted from Washington Times

When Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy sits for a deposition in the Murray Energy legal case against the Clean Power Plan (CPP), she should be asked how much the CPP's carbon reductions would affect the climate.  If Ms. McCarthy gives the same answer she gave in the Sept. 18,2913 hearing of the House Subcommittee on Energy and Power, she will have to admit that the CPP will have no measurable impact on climate ({"Lawsuit to stop 'war on coal'  could derail Obama environmental agenda,"  Web, Nov. 18).

If she continues as she did then, she will say that the CPP is still worthwhile because, to quote from her subcommittee testimony, it "is part of an overall strategy that is positioning the U.S. for leadership in an international discussion, because climate change requires a global effort."

But why, Ms. McCarthy should be asked, would developing countries, now the source of most of the world's carbon-dioxide emissions, follow the United States on this? After all, it would require curtailing their use of coal, the source of 81 percent of China's electricity and 71 percent of India's electricity. If they are to continue to develop and pull their people out of poverty, poor nations must use more, not less, coal since it is their cheapest and most reliable source of electricity

If a U.N. climate treaty is in place by the time Ms. McCarthy testifies, she may point to it as evidence that developing nations will follow the United States' lead. But U.N. climate treaties are based on the Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC), which has given developing nations an out clause. Their "first and overriding priorities," the FCCC states, is not climate change mitigation, but poverty alleviation and development. Since any significant mitigation effort will interfere with these priorities, developing countries will not be held to any emission limits whatsoever.

Even if the questionable science that Ms. McCarthy supports were true, the CPP would clearly be all pain and no gain for America.

TOM HARRIS
Executive director
International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC)
Ontario, Candada

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Obama Is Not Seeking "Legacy"

by Sylvia Thompson
To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.

The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from office.

I focus on white leaders, because whites are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.

Barack Obama's sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded.

It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.

This is my take.

Obama's nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel – the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why.

Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him.

Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.

He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction.

Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is Communist. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America's attempts to keep Communist influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents.

Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue.

Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating.

It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this hateful invasion scheme, and Donald Trump's entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation.

These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is "black."

The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his "legacy building" will not be soon enough for me.

Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives' getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively, and Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 presidential race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it.

Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 election cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.

Sylvia  Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal spin on issues pertaining to race and culture.



Sunday, July 12, 2015

Do You Know How To Catch A Pig ?

There was a chemistry professor in a large college that had some exchange students in the class. One day while the class was in the lab, the professor noticed one young man, an exchange student, who kept rubbing his back and stretching as if his back hurt. The professor asked the young man what was the matter.  
The student told him he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country's government and install a new communist regime. In the midst of his story, he looked at the professor and asked a strange question.  
He asked: "Do you know how to catch wild pigs?"  
The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the punch line. The young man said that it was no joke. "You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come every day to eat the free food.  

When they are used to coming every day, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming. When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence. They get used to that and start to eat again. You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side.  The pigs, which are used to the free corn, start to come trough the gate to eat that free corn again. You then slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd.  
Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity."  
The young man then told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening in America. The government keeps pushing us toward Communism/ Socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned income, tax exemptions, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops (CRP), welfare entitlements, medicine, drugs, etc., while we continually lose our freedoms, just a little at a time as the government forces us to participate in many of these programs whether or not we want to.  

 One should always remember two truths: There is no such thing as a free lunch, and you can never hire someone to provide a service for you cheaper than you can do it yourself.  
If you see that all of this wonderful government "help" is a problem confronting the future of democracy in America, you might want to share this with your friends. If you think the free ride is essential to your way of life, then you will probably not share this.  

 BUT, God help us all when the gate slams shut!  

Comments are invited!
Send feedback to: WatchDog
.