Monday, April 18, 2011

Spare Us the Hypocrisy, Mr. President

By Linda Chavez
Friday, April 15, 2011
President Obama offered few concrete suggestions for spending cuts this week in his much-anticipated speech on reducing the federal debt, but he had lots to say about raising taxes.

"As a country that values fairness, wealthier individuals have traditionally borne a greater share of this burden than the middle class or those less fortunate. Everybody pays, but the wealthier have borne a little more," the president said. So he wants to raise the top marginal tax rate to 39.6 percent and eliminate itemized deductions for the top 2 percent of earners.

What the president didn't say is that he has taken full advantage of each and every tax deduction available to him in order to lower his taxes on his more than $5 million per year income. No one forces Obama to take these deductions, which he objects to so strenuously for everyone else in his income bracket. So let's take a look at the deductions he took last year (the president's 2009 return and that of Vice President Joe Biden are available online):

In 2009, Obama took itemized deductions of $514,819, a foreign tax credit of $59,372, and a deduction for interest on his home of $52,195. He was also able to take a deduction for $49,000 he contributed to his self-employed retirement fund. If he had not taken these deductions, he would have paid taxes on an additional $675,386, which in his income bracket would have meant he owed somewhere in the neighborhood of $200,000 more in taxes at the top marginal tax rate of 35 percent.

Furthermore, he instructed the Nobel committee to donate his entire $1.4 million Nobel Prize directly to 10 charities, thereby avoiding the necessity of declaring the money as income on which he would have owed an additional $490,000 in taxes.

If the president is so appalled at the rich and their ability to hire accountants to take advantage of each and every deduction, why doesn't he simply take the standard deduction on his tax return, like most Americans? In 2009, he could have claimed an $11,400 standard deduction for married couples, as well as an additional $7,300 for his two daughters. Admittedly, that's a loss of more than $650,000 in deductions -- but at least he could avoid looking like a hypocrite by advocating one thing for everyone else and doing quite another himself.

Obama might even get a few of his liberal millionaire and billionaire friends to go along if he leads by example. Obama supporter Warren Buffett is famous for declaring his taxes are too low. Maybe Buffett would be willing to forego filing all those additional schedules on his tax return and simply take the standard deduction instead. Last year, Buffett claimed he paid an effective rate of 17.7 percent on the $46 million he earned, or roughly $8 million. But if he'd simply taken the standard deduction, he would have paid almost twice that in taxes. No one stopped him from doing so.

And then there's Obama's good friend Jeffrey Immelt, General Electric CEO and chairman of the White House Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. Mr. Immelt's firm will pay no federal income taxes on the more than $5 billion it earned in the U.S. in 2010. It's all perfectly legal. The company can take net operating losses to offset its tax liabilities, including certain carryovers from previous years. What's more, Immelt has a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders to take advantage of all tax deductions the company is entitled to.

But there's nothing that stops Immelt from paying additional taxes on his personal income if he chooses to forego deductions. According to GE's annual filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, GE paid Immelt $7.3 million in cash and perquisites worth almost $400,000, in addition to stock currently worth $7.4 million, which vests over time.

Perhaps Obama should ask Immelt to skip his itemized deductions for the year and fork over $5 million to Uncle Sam. Somehow I don't see that happening. Like most limousine liberals -- who fly private jets to global warming conferences and live in 10,000 square-foot houses -- President Obama talks a great line but lives very differently.

When the president voluntarily gives up his deductions and asks his wealthy donors to do the same, he'll have some moral authority to argue, as he tried to in his speech, that he wants a tax code that "is fair and simple -- so that the amount of taxes you pay isn't determined by what kind of accountant you can afford." Until then, spare us the hypocrisy, Mr. President.

Comments are invited!
Send feedback to:  WatchDog


Alexi said...

Congress writes the tax code and then they act surprised when people or corporations take advantage of the breaks provided. How stupid can these people get?

However, when one of their own, like Obama takes advantage, they ignore it.

High IQ is definitely not a condition required for electio9n to Congress for the White House

Anonymous said...

Thinking outside the "Obama haters box":

I see the job of the USA President as one who sets an ultimate goal then directs others to achieve it (avoiding micro managing). Those folks draft a step by step procedure and forward to the president for approval.

As I have said here prior, the wealthiest use the "system" more and therefore should pay more taxes to support it.

The tax process provides for Obama to take referenced deductions, is the article faulting him on moral grounds?

If the referenced taxes on the Nobel Prize money are correct Obama would still have net almost a million dollars after tax so to say he gave it to charity to avoid taxes is a twist that defies common sense.

In this country we play by the rules until we change them.

Watch Dog said...

I agree with you that Mrs. Chavez took a cheap shot at Obama when she claimed that he donated the Noble Prize money in order to avoid the taxes. The tax deduction always results in a net loss for charitable donations. One exception might be if the acceptance of the prize might move you into another tax bracket!

However, Mr. Obama is still guilty of criticizing others for getting/taking deductions which he had taken!

Mr. Obama has every right to any deduction that the tax code allows. He is 100% wrong to accuse others of wrong doing or greed for using those same codes.

By the way—I don’t hate Obama, I hate what he has done to the Constitution and I hate the fact that he is attempting to destroy the nation that I love.

Sue May said...

Obama, like all liberals, has never let the facts get in the way of a point that he just made up.