Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts

Friday, July 21, 2017

Facts: The Paris Climate Accord

On June 1, 2017 President Donald J. Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Accord.
Immediately we heard from the media that we were all going to die because of ‘Global Warming’!
If you are interested in reading the “Paris Climate Accord” clickhere.  After you work your way through the ‘16 pages of legalese’, you will find that:
1.      Each nation decides its own goals and methods of achievement (if any).

2.      Only “developed” nations are expected to set and meet their goals.

3.      ‘Developed” nations (largely the U.S.) are expected to pay the cost for developing nation to meet their goals.

4.      The biggest global producer of ‘Greenhouse Gases’, China, has many years to start compliance with whatever goals that it decides it wants to meet.  
In reality, the vast majority of nations only agreed to sign on the condition that they receive large grants of money.  India for example expects to receive 100’s of millions of dollars.
The U.S was committed to contributing $3 billion to start and would have required to pay billions more.    
The scientists predict little or no impact on global temperatures.
In short, “The Paris Climate Accord” was intended to be nothing more than another Obama transfer of American wealth. 

 Comments are invited:
Send feedback to:    WatchDog


Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Yes, It’s A “Major Issue:” The Industrialized World Is Abandoning The U.S.


By Austin Hill 
Vice President Joe Biden announced two days ago that the American people agree with the Democrat party “on every major issue.”   Whether or not this is true remains to be seen, but this we can know with certainty:  on issues of economics, enterprise, and environmental policy, the other industrialized nations of the world have been moving in the exact opposite direction of President Barack Obama and the U.S. federal government for at least the past two years. 

As the President pushes for a $1 billion “climate resilience fund” to save America from global warming – and as he presides over more than $17 trillion in government debt with no plan to either boost economic output nor cut government spending – free people on at least three different continents have elected governments that are behaving more like Reagan and Bush than either Obama or Biden.  One of the most obvious examples of this is just a bit further northward, but right here in North America. 

Consider Stephen Harper, the Prime Minster of Canada. First elected in 2006 on a campaign pledge to, among other things, foster close ties to President George W Bush and America’s efforts to fight terrorism, Harper has over the past eight years championed free trade, federal government spending reductions, and a significant boost in oil production.  Today the Canadian government is on track to be debt-free in 2015, as Harper tirelessly lobbies the U.S. to become more cooperative with oil pipeline projects and energy exploration. 

Then there’s Alison Redford, the Premier of the Province of Alberta (a provincial premier is a counterpart to the Governor of a U.S. state). Redford agreed to serve on a panel with former Vice President Al Gore to discuss oil energy production and “climate change” at last month’s World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and the panel discussion quickly turned in to a debate between the two. 

After the event both Al Gore and the Huffington Post were convinced that Al Gore’s presentation had been brilliant. Yet European media marveled at Redford’s willingness to call-out Gore’s “erroneous” assertions about petroleum-based energy and her “new way of looking at things” pertaining to economic growth. 

Then consider the country of Australia and it’s new Prime Minister Tony Abbott.  It wasn’t sufficient that in 2013 Australia was already a global leader in iron ore and timber production and that’s its’ government was set to close out the calendar year debt-free – no, the citizenry of the land “down under” wanted an even more business-friendly and fiscally sound government for themselves, so they elected a candidate for Prime Mister who repeated from the campaign trail that the global climate change agenda is “absolute crap.” 

Shortly before his election win Abbott was asked in a nationwide television interview “with our government debt so low, why do you want to cut government spending even further?” 

Because there’s still waste in our government, that’s why” Abbott replied.  Shortly after his September 7, 2013 landslide victory he set a date of July 1, 2014 by which he intends to eliminate his nation’s “carbon tax".,

And – gasp! – could it be that the European nations are abandoning their “green” status?  It would appear that way.  Last month the European commission, the legislative body of the union that sets policies shared among the member nations, voted to officially abandon specific sets of “climate change protocols.”  Even more stunning, the commission appears to be preparing to allow fracking among the member nations, with the hope of making Europe a leader in the global natural gas and oil shale markets. 

America may very well still be with Obama, Biden and the Democrat party on “every major issue.”  But the rest of the industrialized world is moving in the exact opposite direction of our President and Vice President, away from the Obama traditions of dangerous government debt and economy-killing environmental zealotry. 


Comments are invited!

Send feedback to:  WatchDog
.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Note To Democrats: Obama’s Just “Not That Into You”

By Austin Hill
Hey Democrats – Barack doesn’t hate you, really.

Barack just “isn’t that into you,” that’s all. In fact, our forty-fourth President of the United States really isn’t “that into” any of us lowly American citizens, so much as he’s into his own power and control and his presence on the global stage.

Don’t waste time taking personal umbrage at the destruction that he's currently bringing upon of your party. Better yet, wake up and realize that your naïve, child-like allegiance to this one-time “charming” public figure has empowered a self-serving force in our country, the likes of which we have never known before.

Then do some reading and studying – learn a few basic things about history, and economics. See how history demonstrates that concentrating increasing amounts of economic power in the hands of politicians and government bureaucrats, produces less prosperity for all, and not more.

I’ve been fascinated to observe how congressional Democrats are reacting to their present circumstances in light of the American voters’ rebuke of the Obama agenda, and the even more visceral rebuke of the Congress itself. To this end, I especially appreciated last week's article from the Thursday, July 15th edition of “The Washington Post,” the headline of which read “House Democrats Hit Boiling Point Over Perceived Lack Of White House Support.”

The article noted that “in recent weeks, a widespread belief has taken hold among Democratic House members that they have dutifully gone along with the White House on politically risky issues -- including the stimulus plan, the health-care overhaul and climate change -- without seeing much, if anything, in return.” This suggests that House Democrats have been “dutifully going along” with Obama’s unpopular agenda, thinking that there would actually be some sort of fruitful “return” – a “return” for themselves, yes, and for their constituents as well.

But why would congressional Democrats be thinking this? And why would they be thinking this in 2010?

A Thursday November 20, 2009 report in the Washington Post indicated that "growing discontent over the economy and frustration with efforts to speed its recovery boiled over Thursday on Capitol Hill in a wave of criticism, and outright anger directed at the Obama administration." In this article, it was also noted that "Episodes in both houses of Congress exposed the raw nerves of lawmakers flooded with stories of unemployment and economic hardship back home. They also underscored the stiff headwinds that the administration faces as it pushes to enact sweeping changes to the financial regulatory system while also trying to create jobs for ordinary Americans."

This is to say that congressional Democrats have at least twice reached the "boiling point" of anger over the lack of prosperity brought about by Obamanomics, in November of 2009, and now again in July of this year. Yet despite their anger, which apparently has been raging-on for at least eight months, the congressional majority has nonetheless chosen to follow their dear leader over a cliff.

In this calendar year, alone, the Obama Democrats have gone to the point of imperiling the nation, and their own re-elections, all for the sake of obeying Obama. The Obamacare bill; repeated renewals of unemployment benefits; a now, Obama's "financial system overhaul" bill that hands-over more control of the banking industry to Obama's Federal Reserve, and as of last Friday, sank the DOW some 200 points or so.

And consider just how pathetic the so-called "healthcare reform" bill really is. Buried in its details are a federal government take-over of the student loan industry (as though "student loans" has anything to do with healthcare); it raises taxes on, of all things, wheel chair purchases (Obama's idea of "compassion" for disabled?); it is so fabulous that Obama provided “exemptions” from the bill’s mandates to the White House and congressional staff who helped write it, and to organized members of the United Auto Workers Union; and individual states are spending their precious-few tax revenues filing law suits to safeguard their residents from the implementation of the bill.

And now, apparently, congressional Democrats are dismayed that Obama doesn't have a "plan," or "sufficient support," to get them re-elected.

Sorry Democrats, but you should have known better. History shows us that this is the way selfish, thuggish, big-government works. Obama had his way with you, and now he's moved on. I hope you go back and learn some things about history and economics. But for now, you have shown yourselves unworthy to lead.

Email Austin Hill


Commewnts are invited!
Send feedback to:  WatchDog
.

Monday, February 1, 2010

More Science: Global Warming Is A Hoax!

The Oct. 2007 issue of the ‘Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons’ contained an in depth report analyzing the data of 100+ studies into the effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) on the environment. The study ‘Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide’ is authored by, Dr A. B. Robinson, Dr N. E. Robinson, & Dr W. Soon, all work at the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine

The following statements are lifted from the Abstract and Conclusions of that report:

"There are no experimental data to support the hypothesis that increases in human hydrocarbon use or in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are causing or can be expected to cause unfavorable changes in global temperatures, weather, or landscape.”


"The Earth has been much warmer during the past 3,000 years without catastrophic effects."


". . . . carbon dioxide . . . . increases during 20th and early 21st centuries have produced no deleterious effects upon Earth's weather and climate."



"We are living in an increasingly lush environment of plants and animals as a result of this CO2 increase. Our children will therefore enjoy an Earth with far more plant and animal life than that with which we now are blessed."


"Increased carbon dioxide has . . . . markedly increased plant growth. "Human use of coal, oil, and natural gas has not harmfully warmed the Earth, and the extrapolation of current trends shows that it will not do so in the foreseeable future."


"The United States and other countries need to produce more energy, not less. The most practical, economical, and environmentally sound methods available are hydrocarbon and nuclear technologies."


Read the entire 12 page report


Comments are invited!
Send feedback to: WatchDog@MindlessAndSpineless.com
.